Test Tube Steaks Coming Soon!

Oh My Gosh! Do you realize we could already be consuming cloned or artificial meats?
We have all heard about Dolly the Sheep who was cloned. Get ready for this they are cloning cows, pigs, goats etc to use for breeders. Dairy farmers clone the best producers and then use them for breeding purposes. In actuality we are consuming the offspring of cloned creatures.

Here's a brief description of what is involved: "A cloned animal is an exact genetic copy of its 'parent.' So logic would imply that th­e composition of its milk or flesh would be exactly the same as that of the animal whose DNA  scientists used to create it. To clone a specific animal - say, a pig --you take a donor egg from a female pig and remove the egg's nucleus, where the genetic information lives. You then insert the nucleus of a cell taken from another pig into the egg. The egg now contains the latter pig's DNA. An electric current then stimulates the egg to begin growing, and the result is a genetic copy, or clone, of that pig."

You may never know what you are eating again!

There are no rules about labeling cloned by-products! The only way to know for sure is to eat only Organic labeled products - The National Organic Program's criteria for organic certification exclude products from cloned animals and their offspring.

The US livestock industry says cloning animals will be the way of the future, it is already widespread in other countries. The cost to clone one cow is $17,000 verses purchasing a traditional bull at $4,000. That bull better have what it takes to pay for itself!
Mark Walton, president of Via Gen (the US leading animal cloning company) says the program is still in the experimental stages. Livestock farmers are trying to determine if it will be feasible to invest in such a program.

If that doesn't turn your stomach a little sour, then this will. According to Jason Matheny of New Harvest are studying the process to produce cultured meat by an in vitro cloning process. Of course they are touting the in vitro method uses 90% less land and water and generates 90% fewer greenhouse gases. They will only clone the very best meats from dead animals. The crazies from PETA have offered a $1 million prize for the first organization to bring cloned meat to market by June 30, 2012. Peta also believes these fake meats should be on the market yesterday. What gives, they don't want us to kill the animals that provide food for us, but it is okay to kill them if we clone their meat!

2 years ago the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined meat and milk from cloned animals is safe to consume. America has to go ahead to sneak this into our food supply. Europe is not using the cloning process and members of Parliament may ban it all together. Many people are cautious and leery of the idea of eating food from clones and the Whole Foods Market has banned the sale of any products of cloning.

I believe the wholesalers and distributors owe it to us to properly label these types of products. The meat and dairy products we purchase in the stores come from animals that are given steroids, vaccinations and their food source is filled with chemicals. They take these animals full of chemicals and clone them, breed them and pass this stuff on to us.

As for me, I will continue to purchase my beef, sheep and pigs from sources I know who raise them naturally. They will be slaughtered, aged properly and butchered to my desire. The difference in flavor is unbelievable. The overall cost is considerably less than if I purchased the same cuts of meat in a grocery store.

I am not for the cloning of animals for any reason. The idea of cloning meat just repulses me, If I am going to eat a steak I want a natural one, not one that is a product of a glass jar. To me that would be an artificial chunk of meat, and we know that almost all artificial products contain harmful chemicals. I want to know what I am eating.
What do you think, should labels be put on foods that are cloned or artificially reproduced?

Deanie

Ground Zero Mosque Fundraiser Paid For With Our Tax Dollars!

In the midst of the controversy over the Mosque being built at Ground Zero the U.S. State Department is sending the mastermind of this horror, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, to the Gulf to discuss religious tolerance in the Middle East, and to get a better understanding of Islam and Muslim communities in the United States. I feel this study would be of more benefit if it were studied right here in our Country, if we are truly wanting to understand these communities. After all this is where they live now, most of them understand they can not invoke a lot of their religious beliefs in the free world.

P.J. Crowley, spokesman for the State Dept. said, "We have a long-term relationship with him," Crowley told reporters, noting that Rauf had visited Bahrain, Morocco, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar in 2007 and went to Egypt last January as part of an exchange program run by the State Department's Office of International Information Programs.
"His work on tolerance and religious diversity is well-known and he brings a moderate perspective to foreign audiences on what it's like to be a practicing Muslim in the United States," Crowley said.

Is this a trip that is supposed to be important to the people of the United States? I don't really see how we will benefit from it. But then again it will give Raul a chance to get the word out about his Mosque and possibly pick up the funds he need. Shame on our shameless Government for once again abusing We The People.

There is much controversy in Congress over the intentions of sending Rauf over there. Rauf has suggested the United States was to blame for the 2001 attacks. Two members of Congress, Representatives Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (Fl) and Peter King (NY) called government sponsorship of Rauf's trip "unaccceptable" and that taxpayer money should not be used.

Rauf is currently is seeking funds to build his $100 million Mosque, and currently refuses to say where the funds will come from. Will this Temple be built with foreign money, many people are concerned money may flow in from Muslim Terrorist organizations. The developers have rejected an offer from New York Governor David Paterson offering state assistance to move the project elsewhere. 

Mr. Rauf is scheduled to go to Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Bahrain and Qatar, the usual stops for Gulf-based fundraising. He is forbidden to do any soliciting for funds while on this journey. Who will be with him 24 hours a day to see that this does not happen?

I am appalled to learn that the United States has provided funding for many foreign mosque construction projects. If we can fund the Muslim Temples, why doesn't the government fund the restoration our historical Churches? Because it is against the First Amendment for the government to fund religious activities. I can't figure out why they think we should restore those facilities that are definitely religious based.

"For those who think the Ground Zero Mosque is an example of "Muslim triumphalism" glorifying conquest, the Amr Ebn El Aas Mosque is an example of such a monument - and one paid for with U.S. taxpayer funds." Read this article from the Washington Times for other Mosques we have paid to rebuild.
 

The Constitution is again being sabotaged. The rebuilding of Mosques by US taxpayer money should not be used to preserve and promote Islam, even abroad. The First Amendment is again being questioned. Government funds can not be used for Religious activities. Section 205.1(d) of title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations prohibits the US Agency for International Development (USAID) funds from being used for the rehabilitation of structures to the extent that those structures are used for "inherently religious activities."

Many questions are arising surrounding the State Departments decision to send Rauf on this project.If this giant Mosque is needed in that part of New York City to accomodate a growing Muslim population, why can't they finance it?

• Is this a taxpayer paid expense to secure funds for the Temple?
• Are our dollars going to help build this shameful tribute to the Muslim faith for their conquest of Ground Zero?
• What other connections does Imam Rauf have with this administration. 
• Why don't we have our Ground Zero Memorial completed? It appears the Muslims will have their Victory Memorial before the United States has their Remembrance Memorial completed.

I do not believe Rauf has any interest in other Religions as he says he does. If he did, he would take the feelings of the victims and the citizens of this Country into consideration before building this Temple that he says will unite all Religions. The location is clearly one that stems from Muslim beliefs, throughout history they have built temples on the sites of their war victories. I am just glad they can't get any closer to Ground Zero.
I am outraged with this administration who disregards what the citizens want and our Constitution. 

Our Country will NOT become a Muslim Nation.

Deanie

Spend - Spend - Spend

Obama has been preaching to the citizens of this Country to "tighten your belts in this unstable economy". He has even gone so far as to tell the Country we do not need to spend our money in Vegas. Which vastly hurt Las Vegas' economy. In other words we should not have any freedom to spend our money as we see fit. We, The People, have been doing all we can to make ends meet and most of us enjoy very little or no entertainment. Our unemployment rate is at an all time high. Our Country's deficit continues to grow and we are worried and mad. It appears to me that when this president speaks and tells us what to do he, his administration and his family do not need to follow his orders, they do just the opposite.

We all know Michelle and Sasha took a fantastic vacation to Spain. There is much controversy about the cost and who is paying for it. According to the law, the government does not pay for personal trips for the first family. The cost of the round trip air flight is about $178,000. The room rates at the Villa the Obama's stayed in range from $400 to $6,500 per night! Apparently the First Family is to pay for the expense of the Air Force jet and any other expenses.

What does irk me is the money we, the taxpayers, will have to pay for all the security guards to go on vacation with Michelle and Sasha. We pay for ALL their expenses. For security reasons, we aren't allowed to know how much of our money was wasted so Michelle could live like a queen!

Obama wants to take from the rich and give to the poor! I am laughing about that, we sure don't see him reaching into HIS pocket to share his wealth with any of us! We have to cut the deficit he says, but at who's expense? Ours of course. He never has to live like we do and pay for insurance or wonder if he will have anything left for his retirement. He doesn't have to wonder about unemployment, he will continue to receive his current salary long after he is out of office. These new demands and laws he is putting on the citizens are more than we can afford. I still haven't heard what he ever did with the money he received from the Nobel Prize (which he should have had the decency to refuse). Supposedly he was going to give it to a charity.

The money this administration is blowing on frivolous actions is very degrading to our Country. Our Country should come first, but I don't feel our Country means anything to them. It appears to me that Obama is playing a game of Life, but never grew up and realized he is playing with real people, real businesses, and real money not a game board.

Michelle has 22 personal staff members, yes We pay their salaries. To see the list of titles and names check this out at Snopes. Obama has created 38 Czars, all of whom receive generous salaries from us. Past Presidents and First Ladies all had Czars and personal staff, but this is ridiculous. Never before have we had such spend-aholics in the White House. 

I am so appalled that the person who occupies 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. thinks he is so much better than us, that HE deserves to spend OUR money as he sees fit. We have given our children's futures to greedy Socialists. Not one of his expensive bills he has passed have the majority of the people wanted.

If none of the above pisses you off keep reading. 

The arrogant pres was scheduled to give a lecture on the economy to a local DC business just 6 miles from his beloved oval office, a mere 20 minute drive through DC with his motorcade. Sounds like a pretty simple trip to me. The money spending Socialist didn't want to drive so he took Marine One on a 6 mile joyride! Marine One is the Presidential Helicopter, and always flies in groups of identical choppers, sometimes as many as 5. At the destination there is generally at least one fully dressed Marine to greet the President and a limousine is waiting. WE pay for all that.

I could not find any figures on the expenses we will pay for this flight, but I can imagine the humongous price tag we paid for his joyride. Years ago we frivolously chartered a very small helicopter (carried 2 passengers) for an hour flight and paid $400 for the ride. 

I can not imagine the cost of his 6 mile flight aboard Marine One for Obama and his entourage.

According to CBS News this is his 300th trip aboard Marine One.

We need to work on our Representatives and Senators to pass new laws that will curtail some of the frivolous spending our government does. They are cheating us out of our Country.

Deanie

Liberals, Your Health Care Lies and Deceit Will Defeat You!

"We have to pass the bill before we can see what is in it." When Nancy Pelosi proudly blurted those words out we were all too appalled. Now that we are learning all the hidden little items that were installed in the giant bill were overlooked by many House members. The great unjustice this government has passed on to us and our children can not be taken lightly. We were promised from day one of Obama's administration we would not see an increase in taxes. Obamacare was not supposed to add any more taxes on us. All I can see is no end to the taxation this administration is imposing on us.

With most of the country already in an uproar over Obamacare or properly named the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, here is one more hidden addendum for us to beware of; Section 9006 of the Act is bringing more resentment for this bill and this Socialistic, Communistic administration.

We all know buying and selling gold has been an action many investors have taken recently in this recession. When they sell their precious metals, they will receive a 1099 form from the buyer. Taxes will be charged to the seller based on the selling price!

The following are excerpts from and abc article

Starting Jan. 1, 2012, Form 1099s will become a means of reporting to the Internal Revenue Service the purchases of all goods and services by small businesses and self-employed people that exceed $600 during a calendar year. Precious metals such as coins and bullion fall into this category and coin dealers have been among those most rankled by the change. 

This new tax code will bring in an estimated $17 billion in revenue.

Coin dealers are in an outrage over this action, as they buy precious metals and coins from other dealers and the public. If a dealer purchases more than $600 in gold from an individual he will have to issue a 1099 Form to the buyer.

Liberty coin Service deals with about 1,000 customers per week say Pat Heller (owner). He estimates he will have to hire 2 full time employees to do nothing but handle the paper work for an estimated 10 to 20 thousand tax forms that will have to be filed with the IRS. This will definitely cut into his profits.

The office of the National Taxpayer Advocate, a citizen's ombudsman within the IRS, issued a report June 30 that said the new rule "may present significant administrative challenges to taxpayers and the IRS."

CNN's article, Health care law's massive, hidden tax change is very informative. Businesses will be swamped with an excess of tax paper work.
Right now, the IRS Form 1099 is used to document income for individual workers other than wages and salaries. Freelancers receive them each year from their clients, and businesses issue them to the independent contractors they hire.
But under the new rules, if a freelance designer buys a new iMac from the Apple Store, they'll have to send Apple a 1099. A laundromat that buys soap each week from a local distributor will have to send the supplier a 1099 at the end of the year tallying up their purchases. 

Where tangible goods were exempt from this law, now they will be subject to IRS rules and require 1099s issued to not only individuals , but corporations as well.


Be careful folks Big Brother is arriving. They are forcing us to leave a paper trail that will travel from the poor individual trying to make a living to the large corporations. The small business man will suffer the most, as he more than likely does not have the knowledge to understand this or the means to hire a full time accountant to take care of these matters.

We own a mobile home park and if I interpret what I have read, each tenant will be responsible for sending me a 1099 at the end of the year, if we receive more than $600 from them. The same applies to the very small water utility company we own. We will be flooded with the burden of handling a lot more paperwork. I also do not like the idea of giving my private information to a bunch of tenants I may evict sometime during the year.

I am also under the understanding if I have a giant garage sale and someone offers me $700 for the entire lot he will be required to send me a 1099 form for junk I no longer need.

This being the case it is imposing a double tax on many items. If I buy a $2000 piece of equipment and the economy goes down; I have to sell it for $1000, I will have to pay tax again on it. 

People want to know "What this has to do with the health care bill and why weren't we told of this earlier?" The only way I can answer this question is you have Obama, Pelosi, Reid and the other Liberals who say they are representing you while lies continue to be their agenda to thank!
 

I am not an tax accountant, so I could be wrong in my interpretation. 

Let me know how you interpret this?

Deanie

The Union Is Hiring Non-Union Employees! What's Going On?

With the extremely high unemployment rate and no end in sight, skilled and non-skilled workers, seniors and college graduates are finding unusual work in the strangest places. And most of them have no idea what, why or who they are representing.

The Mid-Atlantic Regional Council of Carpenters is hiring  Nonunion Workers to protest work being done by nonunion carpenters! The reason being; it's difficult for union members to come out due to parking or something else.

The fake union protesters are being paid minimum wage ($8.25 per hour) to walk around with signs and sound off! George Eisner, the union's director of organization says the "extra feet help the union staff about 150 picket lines in DC and Baltimore each day."

Imagine the Union actually hiring NON-UNION workers to protest the hiring of non-union workers. It seems a bit contradictory to me!

People looking for jobs can go online and get a job as a paid activist, representing groups that are against offshore drilling and groups to support the Constitution of the United States. I do not think the job qualifications are very steep. Just about anyone will get hired.

Sounds crazy, but the trend is growing and most of the paid activists don't care what they are supporting or against, all they know is they are receiving an income.

One organization in Calif. will pay $10 per hour and up for Stand-in activists to to carry signs banning foam cups and plastic bags. (That's gotta be in S.F. I'll be whacko Nancy is all for it!)

The fall elections will be influenced by the Faith and Freedom Network in Bellevue, Wash. The group is seeking activists willing to work for $10 per hour to promote statewide candidates with Judeo-Christian values. Their job will require them to go door to door and meet in mass, hopefully drawing media attention.

A baseball fanatic from Chicago posted and ad on Craigslist offering to pay anyone who attended the Cubs opening day at Wrigley Stadium. Sorry folks this job no longer exists - Opening day was in April! The cause was to stop a huge sign that would block people's view of the stadium from high rises. There were only 50 people who showed up to get their signs.

Stephen Borlik, a recent college graduate found the available job opportunities discouraging and is now receiving $13/hr. working as a fund raiser for Care. To maintain his position with Care, he must meet a weekly quota of 2 new donors per day donating a minimum of $20 each.

Do the math if he only meets his daily quota of $40 and works an 8 hour shift he gets paid $104. How can Care, an antipoverty nonprofit organization

have any money to help the poor?

People are taking jobs like these because it is better than not working at all. The majority of us have encountered fundraisers and protesters like this before. I am shocked to think that I actually believed they were doing that because they believed in a cause and not for money.

Now that I think about it, when I would ask about their program most of them did not know very much about it and would hand me a brochure.

This has truly become a country of protesters and demonstrators. I remember helping my mother stuff envelopes and going door to door for the March of Dimes and various other organizations she volunteered for.

Where have all the compassionate people gone who would do these things for free because they believed in the cause?

I will continue to protest at Tea Parties because I believe in fighting for our Constitution and our Countries Freedom. You will never see a paid protester attend one of those!

True Patriots and Believers will never take money for the future of this Country.

Sadly I think the Far Left would go to that extreme to get what they want.

Tea Party Deanie
source

Az Lawsuit - Another Ploy For Minority Votes?

From day one, the Obama administration has been refuting the wishes of the majority of Americans. I won't go into all the details since we all know what they are.
Arizona's SB 1070 has been under fire since it's conception, by this administration, the ACLU, states, cities and various organizations. Obama has claimed this bill as misguided and irresponsible. Despite frantic calls from Az. Governor Jan Brewer, he has shown his irresponsibility by refusing to meet with her. He finally granted her a few minutes of his precious time last month, I am sure as a result of pressure from the media.

From the day he was sworn into office as the President of the United States, he has shown partiality towards the Hispanic and minority communities. He has promised the Illegal Aliens (the majority of whom are Hispanic) complete amnesty. Which he has yet to fulfill.

He started a racial problem with a college professor (whom he knew) and a law officer, which resulted in a solve-nothing "Beer Summit." As if that was going to stop, what he interfered in, to begin the aspect of racial profiling.

As time goes on it is obvious this man disrespects the United States of America. I wonder why he just doesn't resign and go ruin someone else's country.

After his refusal to send assistance to the border states, Arizona decided to uphold the Constitution of The United states of America and pass SB1070. The short bill (17 pages) is patterned after the Constitution, and the states are obligated to uphold the Constitution. That is what is Arizona is doing. The law specifically specifies there cannot be any racial profiling in asking for identification and citizenship status.

Although Obama has ridiculed the bill on moral disapproval, his Department of Justice is suing the State of Arizona and Governor Jan Brewer. Read the Lawsuit it is only 25 pages double spaced.

The administration stresses the lawsuit is about the law and it's legalities, they claim Az is trying to enforce immigration status and that is the the federal government's responsibility and not the states.

All this leaves one to wonder if this is not another campaign ploy to get the Hispanic voters on the side of the Democrats. Polls show over 70% of voters favor SB1070, I do not think there will be enough Hispanic voters turn out at the polls this November to help the Democrats. I live in Lubbock, Texas where Hispanics are the majority, and I have not met one who believes the bill will promote racial profiling. Many of the Hispanics voted for Obama, but shortly thereafter have changed their party affiliation. They do NOT want amnesty for ALL illegals. And the DO approve of SB1070 and say they will be proud to show their identity.

Has the Obama administration overstepped it's bounds by suing Arizona? There are already states and organizations and even an illegal suing. Many scholars believe the lawsuits will not stand up in court, including the DOJ's. Arizona is already strapped financially and they are asking for donations to aid in their defense. Now the Federal Government is suing Az for the same complaints, why add the burden of a Federal lawsuit to the state of Az. Why am I going to pay for a non-American government to sue an American State. That's right you and I will be paying the bill. I will donate gladly for the defense of Arizona, but my tax dollars will be paid very begrudgingly.

Greta van Susteren of Fox News has a great blog out about the DOJ's lawsuit, here is just on excerpt from the lawsuit filed with the court:

"If allowed to go into effect, SB 1070's mandatory enforcement scheme will conflict with and undermine the federal government's careful balance of immigration enforcement priorities and objectives..." (paragraph 4 of the lawsuit)

Greta's response: "If I were representing Arizona, I would want to know who wrote the above. Why should the government's "careful balance of immigration enforcement priorities" give the feds green light to ignore violations of the law? We have laws so we all know where the line is and the Feds can't keep moving the lines. And how can the fed government's objectives be anything but lawful enforcement of the law it has written and passed? If the feds don't want to enforce a law, the feds should abolish the law. Selective enforcement is not right - either enforce the law or get rid of it."


Gov. Brewer's response to the lawsuit filed by the DOJ: "It is wrong that our own federal government is suing the people of Arizona for helping to enforce federal immigration law. As a direct result of failed and inconsistent federal enforcement, Arizona is under attack from violent Mexican drug and immigrant smuggling cartels," she said in a written statement. "Now, Arizona is under attack in federal court from President Obama and his Department of Justice." She also accused the Obama administration of a "massive waste of taxpayer funds."

I believe Obama will do anything he can to get the minority votes. If we have an honest Justice System he will not win this lawsuit on the grounds he filed on. What do you think?

Deanie

The Stupidity Of Our Elected Officials - THE BORDERS ARE SAFE

Congressman Pete Stark (Ca-R) is one of the most obnoxious men I have ever heard of. Stark blatantly mocks Golden Gate Minuteman Steve Kemp for wanting to ask a question. At a town hall meeting he asked Steve "Who are you going to kill today?" The whole meeting was nothing but mockery coming from Stark's mouth.

Minuteman Kemp asked him about the Federal Government's failure to respond to border security, with a sneer the Congressman responded, "We can't get enough Minutemen armed. We'd like to get all the Minutemen armed so they can stop shooting people here." (I didn't know the Minutemen were shooting People.) The audience became agitated.

When asked by his constituents to answer the question seriously, he simply said: "If you knew anything about our borders, you would know that's not the case. Our borders are quite secure, thank you,"

Later Stark asked Steve what he would do to secure the border. Steve replied send 25,000 troops and build a fence. The Ca. Representative replied with yet another tactless remark: "But I've got to know how high the wall is and I'll sell a whole lot of ladders for people who want to come," Stark said.
"This is a very serious matter and you're sitting there making fun of it," the Minuteman responded.
"I don't have to make fun of you sir, you do a fine job all by yourself," Stark said.
Watch the Video! This guy isn't joking. He answered all the questions in the same disgusting, non-caring obnoxious manner.

This is only one of many rather slanderous attacks the Representative has made on constitutients and other elected officials. Don't forget in 2007 Stark's outlandish statement that raised outrage throughout the country. Referring to Bush's deployment of soldiers to Iraq Stark said, "to get their heads blown off for the president's amusement." How that moron continues to get re-elected is beyond me, he has been in office for 38 years and holds the title of having the 5th worst voting record in Congress. Unbelievably, it looks like he will win in November. Wake up California! Is this the kind of person you want representing you? I don't!

Oh My Gosh! BREAKING NEWS - This Administration has finally figured out a way to help Arizona solve their border problem. While we were asleep they voted to move the entire State of Arizona to the interior of our country! There one more problem solved, Arizona no longer shares a border with Mexico. You don't believe me? Watch this video as Milwaukee County Board of Supervisors member Peggy West says Mexico and Arizona Do Not Share a border! Where did that dingbat come from?

Secretary of State Hilda Solis says undocumented workers should be paid equal wages! We are just going to turn our backs on US Immigrations Laws to enforce equal pay for illegals! Basically the Government is saying they will do nothing to the illegals if they report themselves so they can receive more money. The stupidity of this! With employment at an all time high, employers are going to have to pay equal and fair wages to illegals! If this happens, then the Liberal's precious illegals will no longer be necessary in this Country, so they can just return to Mexico and let the Legal Citizens have the jobs. Actually this would solve lots of problems, Obama could just forget about his amnesty plans.

Gov Jan Brewer asked for 6,000 troops to aide in the Border and will get 1200 (maybe) to do mostly paper work, not protect Arizona and the USA. I wonder if the lame-brain in DC will be giving the troops "How To Screw The US" brochures to hand to all the illegals as they are processing them.

Although the Obama Administration continues to state, ''The Borders Are Safe And Secure" they did erect some well worded signs that should make any visitor to Arizona feel welcome.  Since the  illegals are Not a threat to us and we need to give them amnesty, I wonder why the Fed Gov posted signs saying "smuggling and illegal immigration may be encountered in this area." Another says "travel not recommended" due to "active drug and human smuggling" routes.

There are 3500 acres of Arizona Federal Land that is occupied by illegals and drug cartels who have set up armed guards. The area is deemed dangerous because of smuggling routes.

All this makes me feel SAFE! Yeah Right..  It is reassuring to know we have so many pea-brains in office leading our country in the right direction. Ha! Tell me they are not the epitome of stupidity.
We better wake up America only We The People can change the direction our country is going. We don't need any more Muslim, Anti America, non-caring, obnoxious, dimwitted morons in office.

Do you feel any safer knowing all this? I sure don't.

Deanie
Read my previous posts on immigration.